Skip to main content

The PsychCafe
Share, connect, and learn.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Wow Monte, how thought provoking. Thanks for posting about it. I have told my T that she doesn't give me enough of her - ie she is too hidden. We have a mutual friend and a mutual colleague and we are working out boundaries. I told my T that I think she is even more closed book with me because of our outside friends than she would be with other clients. I told her about a previous T where we worked on projects together in the day, I then went to therapy - and then we would work again during the week. The social hat was on, then in therapy the therapy hat went on and then at teh end of every session T would spend 5 mins 'chatting' - this gave me a glimpse of her other HUMAN side. I can switch between the different hats and I don't get confused.

I realise right now with my new T is that I really miss that HUMAN side and I WANT it with my new T. My new T is closed book. I want more. But after reading your post here - I am thinking my new T is a much quieter and reserved person FULL STOP whereas my other T was more outgoing, friendly and out there. Maybe I am asking new T something she cannot give?

My new objective is to really emotionally *get* to my new T to see how upset she gets and to see whether there is more behind that robot face of hers. I nearly saw it once - I should stop staring at the ceiling or out of the window and actually look at her to achieve this. I am always looking at her proving herself to ME. I don't have proof that I can trust her.

Our mutual friend tells me how absolutely lovely my T is outside of session. She sounds like a friend I would die to have. I don't get that in sessions - I get the efficient robot. That effing hurts me bad. But, on the other hand I really love knowing that she is a beautiful friend to my friend. That has helped me stay in therapy.

So I am not sure. Based on your comments here - I think my T is showing different personalities OR her ethics and boundaries cause her to act differently.

OR maybe , just maybe - my T is feeling so stressed and pressured that she has a mutual friend as a client and she is freaking out every session because she doesn't want to do the wrong thing? neglect, abuse, major abandonment, suicidality, SI - these aren't Sunday afternoon strolls in the park.

I just wish I knew what was going on inside her head. I wish we could get drunk together so the truth serum would give me the info.


Can't wait to see what everyone else says on this.
Monte,

Very interesting. I do think that personality (like DF said) plays a much bigger role than some T's would like to admit. I think it is possible that certain innate personality traits would match better with certain people just like they do out in the real world and I think like you expressed that those innate qualities can come through regardless of the T's orientation in terms of therapy.

Sometimes I feel like I know my T pretty well and then sometimes I think I don't know her at all. However, I often wonder if some of that is part of her personality. Some of the things that tend to drive me crazy with her I often wonder if she does IRL with friends/family as well. It's hard to say. I know a fair amount of information about my T (obviously a drop in the bucket of her actual life) and it's given me some insight and glimpse into how she handles things. Honestly, if I think too deeply about it then I get a bit freaked out. It's hard to explain and a bit personal on both sides (hers and mine), but I try not to think too much about it because it makes me question things too much.

ETA: My T does show a small amount of emotion at times. It is never very "big" but she often gets teary and sometimes her voice will catch, but she is really good at holding it back. That amount of emotion works well for me. If she was falling apart I wouldn't feel safe because I'm usually already falling apart.
Hi Monte,

Interesting topic, and I have a few things that struck me:

quote:
the boundaries you bump into maybe aren't always about them professionally per se, but about them personally.

and

But at a deeper level now...he can be so dry. Not clinical, not cold...just so un-effusive. As much as he encourages me to bring forth emotion in session and is accommodating with my needs, requests etc, it still eludes me. I wonder if it's simply because he is not an outwardly emotional person himself, so he does not impact me in the way I need to be impacted in order to connect emotionally. In fact maybe because his influence over me is so great, his stoicism influences me more. He does not 'show' me how it is done, as such. He says emotion is good and healthy and acceptable and he wants to see it, but he doesn't 'do' it himself. He is warm and friendly, open to touch as I have said, and endlessly patient and accepting...but beneath that is a certain impassiveness that I wonder if I am actually tapping into unconsciously.


I have struggled with this same stuff. My T has been emotional on only 3 occasions that I can recall. The rest of the time she is what you describe your T to be, to a certain extent. I can't call her 'dry', but un-effusive yes. Sometimes she gets pretty animated with what she is saying to me, but it's when I am really down and out and need a sort of pick-me-up, and she is good at making me smile, laugh, etc. But as far as emotional goes, she is SO not that. In fact the times she has shown any emotion have been extremely powerful connecting moments for us, and I of course would love to have that on a weekly basis. But I think her own personal boundaries keep her from being emotional with me. She once told me her own co-workers had never seen her cry, and she's been working there for 12 years. It made me feel privileged that I have seen tears in her eyes, because I know she's not one to be emotional. I think it is part of who she is, too, not a professional thing.

I find myself wishing she were more emotional, more demonstrative of her own emotions, more inviting of emotional response from me. But I somehow (especially now that we aren't focusing on the attachment) get the feeling that is just not how she works. She tells her own stories with very little emotion attached, so it is harder for me to 'see' how it is done. I usually am totally detached from emotions myself, so yes, it would be nice to have her work to get me to show emotion.

When I DO show emotion, I feel very embarrassed, even like it's wrong for me to be crying in front of her because her own lack of emotions has always caused me to feel like it's just not acceptable. I get mixed messages, because sometimes when I cry she asks me what I'm feeling, and twice she has tried to calm me by putting her hand around my wrist, or holding my hand in both of hers, but those were times where I was full of self-disgust and self-hate. Of course it always helps when she moves her chair in REALLY close so that her knees are touching the couch and we aren't even a foot away from each other. Having her right there in my face causes me to better connect to my emotions, but it's just not her 'style' or her M.O., so I usually just sit there feeling like an idiot for not controlling my own emotions while I'm sitting there. It's so conflicting.

I wish we both had T's that were more 'gushy' and prone to show emotion, or help evoke our own within us. I'm sorry this is a struggle for you, too. Frowner Sometimes I feel it is going to be all up to me to get there, I just don't know 'how' to.

I hope your session went/goes well. Take care!

MTF
I know a fair amount about my T. He discloses quite a bit but always as it pertains to my therapy issues. We have a similar background in so many ways, to include a very unique career path...it's like we were separated at birth, lol.

So, I know (or surmise based on stories) that in his personal life with family and friends, he is touchy feely and emotional. In therapy, he walks a finer line but always empathetic.

I am totally shut down. No matter if he shed some tears or sat there stoically I don't see it impacting my ability, or lack thereof, to emote. I'm just not ready, willing, able to go there.

edited to add that if T did shed a tear, I'd launch into caretaker mode on steroids leaving me even more repressed in terms of my own emotions.
Monte - this is definitely something I have noticed with my T. In fact, my T has all but admitted to structuring a lot of his work around his own strengths (i.e. relational and intuitive stuff). When asked for more structural things, he will tend to try to help me get outside structure in place, because he feels uncomfortable with his lack of talent there. I gave up on him being THAT person quite a while ago. Professional boundaries due come into play, I think, when a T's personal boundaries would be a lot greater than they think are allowed and/or advisable. My T does a lot more self-disclosure than I think many do and has openly said that his personal inclinations about physical contact are much more open than what he feels his profession dictates. My T is expressive in his words, but often I find it hard to feel like he's emoting when he says he is. He will say, "[Abuser's name] makes me so angry!" and he sounds, maybe, his normal calm with a little agitation thrown in, LOL. I'm thinking, "Wow, if that's 'so angry,' what in the hell have *I* been witnessing all these years at home, psychotic rage?" He also totally does not "get" my expressive stuff. He still encourages me to write and draw and praises it, but will often admit, "I don't really understand what _____ is getting at." It's so painful for him to not get things that mean a lot to me (especially my poetry) that Friday when he brought up a poem I had sent him the day before, I told him I didn't like it and kind of stonewalled the subject, because it's just too hard for him to say, "That's pretty. You're a good writer," when I've painstakingly crafted the written equivalent of a snapshot of my most wounded part, KWIM?

That said, one thing I DO find comforting is that even if he changes his approach to working with me a bit in terms of what he discovers works best, I will not changing who he is. He is not going to suddenly become someone else. My mother was so erratic when I was a child, and is still now to some degree, that the idea that my behavior might change him in some essential way would be quite scary.
((((MONTE))))

Finding this thread very interesting because I too have wished my T was more emotional or was able to draw the emotions out of me somehow. And sometimes I do wonder if it's just his personality. I am currently reading Attachment in Psychotherapy and finding it to be an amazing read. The author talks about the relationship being co-created. And that the therapists brain often is mirroring our own behavior because that's what we as humans do and that we mirror back and so on and so forth. I've been wondering if my T seems stiff because I'm stff and the more I open up, maybe the more he'll open up.

I've also asked myself how I would feel if he got emotional and I'm not too sure I would like it or be comfortable with it. But then again, I just wish he could help me become more comfortable with my emotions and help me access them more.

Monte, are you planning on taking this up with T? Let us know if you do since we all seem to struggle with something similar. Maybe I'll bring it up to my T on Thursday.

We have been discussing that I'm not as comfortable with him when he's TOO clinical. But on the other hand, I'm not sure I'd ever be comfortable with him. Frowner Somehow I have to learn to tolerate this incredible intimate relationship.

I do like it better when we talk about deep things as opposed to surface stuff. I like feeling connected to him in that way. But sometimes I find it hard to get there. You too?

xoxoxo

Liese
quote:
SD, I simply could not bear to know anyone that knows my T personally, much less as a close friend. I would be consumed with envy and pain and also curiosity...probably the inherent nature of such an intense but one-sided relationship. This sounds like a tricky and not ideal situation for both you and your T, but these are the situations life deals out sometimes. Were you aware of this connection with current T when you started? And you clearly knew your previous T outside therapy too. Wow...that sounds challenging... all that hat-changing. But it would truly give you insight into who they were and how 'real' they are being with you in therapy. And yes, I too wish sometimes I could 'get' to my T, elicit something unguarded. Maybe it's better that we can't?



I AM consumed with envy, pain and curiosity. It makes it difficult. BUT. I had a double life with my last T and i can do it. I have come to realise that I wouldn't see a T if I didn't know something about them. My friend adores my T, a colleague highly respects her - I needed those two endorsements for me to even consider my T. If she was a stranger - I wouldn't connect. So the difficult road is the only one for me.

I had made the appointments BEFORE I knew my friend knew her. If I had known how close they were (and how sweet T is in real life) I don't think I would have gone to her. I tell my T that I know she is lovely and sweet in the real world - but to me she is bossy, mean and unfeeling (said with a joke) - just letting her know that I know she has two sides of her and I get the therapeutic side.

Maybe I am hoping that one day that lovely and sweet person will be lovely and sweet to me.
Monte,I do believe that a Ts personality and how it relates to our own can be a big factor in how we get along in therapy and how successful our therapy is.

I also think that if our Ts personality reminds of our mother or our father or someone significant, that can really put a good or bad spin on things.

T1 once said to me, "You and T2 both have very strong personalities...so its only natural that you are going to butt heads at times". It made me realize how more alike T2 I am than T1 and it sort of made me sad.

T2 was very sassy, opinionated, and extremely expressive with her facial expressions and mannerisms. She didn't hold anything back and you always knew where you stood with her.

T1 is much more reserved and down to earth. She's passive, quiet, and far more reflective than T2. T2 didn't "think" things...she said them out loud. T1, on the other hand, thinks and though she does share her thoughts, there are many times that she doesn't and I sometimes (mis)interpret that to mean she doesn't care, isn't listening, doesn't get it, or wants me to move on to something else.

T1 has a playful side though and I feel immense joy when I am able to bring that out and get her to laugh.

T2 was very warm and compassionate and when I was talking about painful stuff, her eyes welled up with tears and I felt like she was really there with me in my pain, but now I think a lot of that was fake.

T1 can seem cool and aloof and distant at times, but I know that in her heart, she is a much more genuine person, even if she doesn't always express in ways that I want to hear it and feel it.
LG - my T is definitely like your T1.Mine considers things a lot and takes a while to think and formulate what she is going to say, she seems careful and methodical and thorough. I know T has a playful side - I usually get her to laugh at something each session (although no laughter today....) and occasionally she has said something flippant that I have picked up on.

My last T would be more spontaneous and out of session would be fun, super friendly and out there. I think this T would be much more reserved and introverted. But, I don't know.


What about ages of the T's? My T is 31 or 32 (I think) and I am 44. She was a teenager when my teenager was born! She isn't married, got no kids. How can T's relate to ppl when they have such different experiences. Of course I know that the feelings and therapy are the commonality - but would it be hard for say a 30 year old female T to relate to a 60 year old grandad? And how much does my T relate to me? How would I find that out?
((((MONTE)))))

Just reading a very interesting chapter from an adult attachment book and therapy. There is very detailed information re: how it's not only the attachment style of the patient but also the therapist in terms of a successful outcome. And they talk about different styles of T's and patients and how they interact. It also talked about how a T just may instinctively use a more emotional style with anxiously attached clients and a more cognitive style with avoidant clients.

It also said that insecurely attached T's attend more to dependency needs and made more in-depth interpreations when treating clients with an "anxious state of mind with respect to attachment than when treating avoidant clients. These findings suggest that insecure therpists respond in a complementary way to clients' dysfuctional needs and perhaps perpetuate and reinforce clients' maladaptive attachment strategies."

It was all very interesting and eye-opening.

Still thinking about it all ... hope you have a good session this week!

xoxo

Liese
I wonder if how we percieve our T's is more about how we felt with people when we were younger? What is it exactly "you" would want your T to say or do that would make you feel different? I've often thought this way and really what I thought I needed/wanted wasn't, T was doing and being enought just as she is but all my screams and crys on the inside demanded something else, demanded the breast that wasn't enought once upon a time and that gets caught up in my today.
quote:
Essentially a T can only be 'who' they are, right? I mean they choose an approach, a modality, and work within it and presumably this choice means they will respond to clients in certain ways and offer certain things, but they are still 'them' and can only go as far as the essence of who they are permits them, right?

Might that be sometimes where problems in therapy relationships have their root? Simple personality stuff. Perhaps if I were hugely emotional and given to pools of tears and not good at controlling outbursts etc, he would be stabilizing and calming. But I am so emotionally stifled and I wonder if who he is as a person maybe feeds that. It's not too different from any other relationship where people perhaps don't always bring out the best in each other...something that only becomes apparent as time goes on.


Hi Monte,
I've wanted to respond to this since you posted it but couldn't find the time (ok or focus Big Grin) until today. Its complex since as FFotW mentioned, I do think we bring a lot of things to our theraputic relationship which are about our past. We project needs, and feelings and even expectations of behaviors based on our past. Which means there's a lot of hard work sorting through what is actually coming from our Ts and what we are just "seeing" there so to speak.

But once you clear all that out, I definitely think the answer to your question is yes, at least based on my experience. When I was training to take calls on the crisis line, the best advice I received was during a training shift with one of the trainers (she's now a good friend of mine) which was that although it's important that we follow the call model we're trained in (active listening, non-judgmental, non-directive), we need to be ourselves. It made me realize that it's ok to use humor (carefully of course) on the line because I use humor all the time, it's who I am. It is difficult to reach and connect with someone if you are not being your authentic self. Now the person on the line does not get to see all of me or even most of me (for one thing, it's a 10-20 min phone call, how much ground could you cove? For the second thing, it's not about me, it's about them, so the call needs to stay focused on their feelings and their needs, so much of me remains hidden. The non-judgmental and non-directive part of the model means I keep my values and opinions to myself) BUT what they do see, how I do interact, the understanding I offer is authentically me and grows out of who I am and my experiences. It is easier for me to understand and connect with someone if I have similar experiences. That doesn't mean I can't understand someone dealing with something I don't (I've talked with men struggling with whether they are gay or whether to come out, a problem I'm not ever going to face) but I can usually make the leap with some effort.

But I will also be very honest with you and tell you that although I am equally willing and available for each caller, there are some with whom you form an extremely strong connection very quickly and can feel like you really help, there are callers whom you feel comfortable with and feel like you've helped but nothing out of the unusual, and then there are the people that no matter how hard I try (or how hard they try) you just can't seem to connect. It's not about liking or not liking the person (I have sometimes connected with someone that I really don't approve of and have failed to connect with someone that I have really wanted to). Human chemistry is just complex that way. And the best kinds of Ts really do bring themselves into the room. Not all of themselves, the boundaries are so crucial, but the part that you do see, that you do know, HAS to come from who they really are, there is nowhere else for it to come from. So just as their are good and bad love matches, I think there are good and bad theraputic matches.

I had a really interesting conversation once with a nurse practioner I was sitting for meds at a psychiatrist's practice. She was asking how therapy was going and at the time I was making a lot of progress and was really pumped about therapy. She was excited for me and ended up asking who my therapist was, especially as she was new to the area and was looking for Ts to recommend. When I told her the name of my T (who is fairly well known around here), she recognized his name and she told me that she had heard good things about him from other patients but no one has spoken quite as highly about him as I had. I honestly believe that my T has been so effective because on we are a theraputic match made in heaven so to speak. There is some weird interaction between the issues I need deal with and who I am, and his experience and how he operates and who he is, that made us a particularly effective working partnership. I understand that another person could try to work with him and be like what the hell was AG talking about? He's not all that great. I also get that I might have not been able to progress as far or as well as I have with my T with another T.

As nice as it would be that any T could help any patient, I think it's an unrealistic expectation. I mean, we wouldn't expect any two people in the world to be able to be happily married or be able to successfully run a business together. I think it's one of the reasons that people need to be willing to look around a little and talk to different Ts in order to find a good theraputic match.

AG
((((MONTE)))))

I hope you don't let these "new' insights get in the way of trying to work it out with your T. My T has always been willing to be as patient as I need him to be until we figure out together why it's so hard for me to open up. And he's willing to adjust things and try new things. I have a feeling your T would do the same. Read that chapter on avoidant types in that book I mentioned above.

xoxoxo

Liese
Aw Monte- I'm so sorry that you are running into this. I'm really, really not sure about it. There may not *be* a perfect therapeutic match available, you know? Then you run into the idea that, life is not perfect, that we have to make due with what we have sometimes- which means...putting up with plain old suffering. Don't get me wrong- I am NOT saying.."just take the defeatest approach, give up, and deal with things the way they are, because improvements in your life aren't possible." No way. But- I'm also not willing to say that perfection or the ideal situation can be found for every single person. I am wondering if there is the possibility that, different persons can meet different needs in you? For example- there is the option that you could continue with your T, since he is and has been a source of great healing for you- and then also meet occasionally with an art therapist for other work from time to time. A lot of that would mean overcoming the desire to have *your* T be the sole source of healing for you. If that is a problem- well- I really, really get that. But there are needs in you that your T meets. and by this point, you and your T have reached the level that the relationship -all by itself- really is very important- just like- I may not always get along perfectly with my 6 year old daughter- we have our issues and incompatabilities- (is that even a word?) but she is my *daughter* and I Love Her. And she gets the best I have to offer. (which at times is most definitely not enough- but- !! In ways- it is enough) So- working on the relationship, on coming to deeper understanding of eachother- really is valuable -all by itself. So I personally think and please understand that this is totally my completely unprofessional opinion- and should be taken as such- that your T should always remain in your life, in one capacity or another. I do not think -personally- that your goal should be termination and moving on. I think in many ways your T does function like a parent to you, and that should be accepted for what it is. That is not a negative thing, but a positive one- he meets the needs that a parent of a grown child should meet. No wrong there. Hmm. that might be painful to read if you are like me. But...I do tend to think that, so I will leave it.

But just as grown children learn to meet needs that their parents do not meet, elsewhere- perhaps you can do the same. so find means of self-expression with others, and then take them back to your T and try to help him understand- and if he doesn't that hurts- like hell- but you can keep trying because the realtionship is valuable.

does anything I say make sense?

Love you-

BB
(((Monte)))

You've hit the nail on one of my greatest fears. Or at least it seems to me if you're struggling with feeling unreachable. For what it's worth, I don't think you're unreachable. Just maybe, your T is there to reach certain aspects of you, and maybe his role in your life will never be to reach those other aspects. This idea made me think of (my deleted thread, LOL PAD) about having these two older males still somewhat in my life (T and my ex-teacher/mentor) who I feel drawn to in completely different ways. I don't think my teacher will ever be able to connect with my spirituality the way T does, never be that gentle presence of just being together with me in pain. Nor do I think my T will ever get the passionately creative part of me in the way my teacher does. Maybe there is a perfect person out there whose role will eventually be to connect to me on all those levels and guide me through all of this, but I suspect not. I suspect God has placed in my life people with just a piece (whether a big piece or small piece) that can meet/reach/connect with some part of me. There is only One who could meet the whole me in that way, in the way that a parent was supposed to emulate (although imperfectly), but I have been given many who can offer me part of that experience...and hopefully add up to an ultimate sense of being connected with the world in a way that is still so illusive. I don't know if I'm making sense here, Monte, but what I am saying is that I do see your T and you reaching each other on some very important levels...it just may be that he is not the one meant to connect to you on some others, and that means that there is someone else waiting to take that role in your life, just as you are waiting to play a role in theirs. ((((hugs)))) to you. I know such things are easier to say about someone else than to believe in for yourself and take heart.
((((MONTE)))))

You sound so sad. But just to let you know, I feel very unreachable also, most of the time. But this week, something is happening within me, something is changing. I've reached a certain level of trust with my T that has had the effect of releasing some new fears, that I didn't know were there and I also experienced some hurt that I didn't know was there. I feel a wall dissolving within me. It's scary but I think I'm on the right track.

Hang in there and talk to T.

xoxoxo

Love,

Liese
Monte, I found this thread very interesting but it seems to have left me with no words. Many times I read and wanted to contribute but the words are frozen and just won't come. I'm wonderng if this is because of where I am lately with old and new T and the processing I'm doing with regard to my relationships with each of them.

On Monday when I saw oldT I worked hard to defend my heart from him. I was closed up tight and the gates were down and windows shuttered. And for part of the session I was angry with him for blaming me, for making it about him, and for being so damn stubborn about stuff. But then at the end of the session when I saw how emotional he was and when he looked at me with that soul rattling look that only he can give me, well then I just melted. All he has to do is look deeply at me and I forget how much he hurt me, how incompetent he was and how cruel he was to me.

Then there is my current T. While part of me responds to him and I do feel close to him, it's in a totally different way. He can reach me with his intellect and his words but he has very different non-verbals and that is what my heart responds to. He just does not touch me in that very very deep and intimate place that old T could easily access in me. I really don't understand it nor can I explain it. It's almost a year and it has not happened. Would you suggest I give up on the hope it will ever happen? I dont know maybe I should. Maybe I should just make do with what I have, which is a very good, ethical and competent T and forget the idea that anyone ever again will reach me in that place that is so hard to reach.

Monte, when you sit with your T and he holds your hands and you pray with him I think he does reach that place but maybe you get so scared that you automatically and immediately shut down the feelings and go numb in defense.

Maybe I do that too. Not sure. Maybe oldT hurt me so badly and damaged me so badly that I will never again allow anyone to enter the places where he freely roamed.

This is a very interesting thread. I do agree with what Beebs and Yaku mention about having other people in our lives satisfy the parts of us that our T's can't seem to touch.

Take care
TN
quote:
Monte, when you sit with your T and he holds your hands and you pray with him I think he does reach that place but maybe you get so scared that you automatically and immediately shut down the feelings and go numb in defense.



I think this is very insightful, TN and probably very accurate.

I know that I find myself wanting more from my T, but when she gives it to me, I shut down and change the subject. I'm not ready to receive the one thing I want the most.

I think its likely you are doing the same, because holding hands and praying is a very emotionally intimate thing to do with someone. That in itself, tells me that T is connecting with you on a deep level,but you may not be able to experience it in its full depth out of discomfort, fear, etc.
Quote:
"I say this because I am struggling with my T and I think it is as much a struggle with who he is as a person as it is anything else."

Oh Monte, your posts always resonate with me.

I have little to offer on this subject, though it is an interesting one.

I struggle with this same thing, and I sigh with you.
quote:
have been seeing him weekly with hardly a break for over 4 months now - a record for me - and sub-consciously I may be looking for an 'out', a break. My pattern has always been to get in only so close, then run off for months at a time to break the connection.


Well we're in therapy to learn to break the patterns, so don't you even think about taking a break or running! (Where's the emoticon that shakes it's finger at you while the other hand is on its hip and its mouth is going a mile a minute?) Big Grin I know that might seem like the 'easy' way out of the fear and panic and angst that you feel, but you'll never get through it all if you don't forge ahead and stick it out. I know you know all of this, and I don't know if you're thinking of running again or not (I'll assume not), but I'm just trying to be the 'voice of reason', if you will. If you need to you can borrow the HTML slapper from AG. Hugs, my friend. Smiler

MTF

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×