The Meaning of Crying Based on Attachment Theory
I’m particularly taken with the distinction the author makes between the popular notion of crying as just a form of emotional expression and the real reason for it, which is active communication and seeking help and support from another person. (My interpretation, not her words.)
Thought I’d post this link for anyone else who has problems with crying (or is just interested in it). Might do a book review of the book when I’ve finished reading it too.
Here’s a couple of quotes from the article to give you a sense of what it’s about. I’ve highlighted the sentences that gave me the eureka moment when I first read it.
quote:ABSTRACT: Crying is inborn attachment behavior which, according to attachment theorists John Bowlby and Margaret Ainsworth, is primarily an appeal for the protective presence of a parent. Infant crying triggers corresponding caretaking behavior in the parents. These reciprocal behaviors help establish and maintain the parent-child attachment bond. Crying continues throughout life to be a reaction to separation and loss, to carry an attachment message, and to trigger caretaking responses. Crying can be classified according to the stage of the grieving process to which it corresponds: protest or despair. The absence of crying when it would be expected or appropriate corresponds to an unresolved grief reaction representing detachment. Each type of crying and noncrying elicits different caretaking responses with interpersonal, clinical, and cultural implications.
quote:Crying is an attachment behavior triggered in infancy by separation (Bell & Ainsworth, 1972; Wolff, 1969) and throughout life by loss (Bowlby, 1969; Nelson, 1979). Crying helps to establish and maintain the attachment tie between infants and their caretakers. After infancy and into adulthood crying continues to communicate a visceral attachment message that is overlooked when it is viewed solely as emotional expression.
LL