Skip to main content

The PsychCafe
Share, connect, and learn.
OK, so here is the deal...my H and I have had serious problems finding a decent couples T. My T recommended a bunch, but most of them weren't actually seeing couples or didn't take our insurance. The rest were too far to get to or didn't have hours that worked with H's workday.

We've been seeing one for a while now, but I'm not sure how successful it's been, although it did seem to help a little. The last session we had with him, he spent most of the time trying to convince us to buy a second car in order to solve our arguments about transportation. The bigger problems (attachment stuff and control issues) remain unresolved.

So, in the middle of all of this, I realized my former T (who I haven't seen in over 18 months) is returning from a sabbatical in a couple of weeks. Some on this forum remember that I stopped seeing her after I reluctantly agreed with her that she wasn't the right T for me at the time. In retrospect, problems included her unclear contact policy, her pushing me too hard and failing to take things slowly around my attachment issues, and her superficial physical resemblance to someone who had recently betrayed me.

I thought about it, and none of those things are going to make any difference any more, or in a couples counselling situation. There would be no reason to contact her outside of session, the focus would be on myself and H anyway, and I'm kind of over the betrayal by my ex-mentor.

Anyway, if my problem with our current couples T is that he doesn't push us to deal with the real issues, and isn't interested in the deeper attachment stuff, oldT as I remember her is exactly the opposite. She is incredibly interested in the attachment side of things, and tends to go straight for the throat in terms of talking about the deeper stuff, which was more than I could handle at the time, but might actually work in a couples framework.

Anyway, am I going nuts here? Is she even likely to consider doing this?
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I think couple's counselling can still dig deep and awaken the same type of issues you sometimes see in individual counselling. I had a powerful negative transference experience with a couple's counsellor. We worked through it okay in the end and I think it was beneficial but I really did struggle with it at the time.

I think you're right and saying that it's between you and H but I suppose it's worth thinking about the possibility that if you're working deeper, you and H may end up exploring your relationship through the lens of how you are responding to the T and what meaning you make from that. Are both of you up for that?

The counsellor does act as a facilitator - but they do often get pulled in and become part of the interaction.

Some counsellors aren't too keen with doing couple's work when they have seen one person already; the belief is that you start with inequality in the room because there is already a shared history with the person who did the individual work. It does vary though.
Hi BLT -

Just want to put my two cents in for working with a Gottman method couples therapist if you possibly can. Their training is very solid and the methodology is evidence-based and often very effective. I've heard from couple of places (individual therapists) that this is now the 'gold-standard' in couples work, and my own experience of it has been excellent. FWIW - and knowing your options sound limited. Good luck.
Thanks all for the comments. Yes, she does see couples on a regular basis and yes she has the Gottman training. The history with me is my main concern and why I imagine she might say no, however. Any transference issues I might have with her, I am not worried about, though. They were overwhelming when I saw her 18 months ago, but so many of them have been worked through with my current T that I doubt they'll be a problem any more.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×