T left a VM explaining that he wasn't referring to a specific session (very painful session) when he made the comment and explained how he meant it. He also apologized for making the comment and not explaining what he meant. He wants me to come in and work through this.
I am going to my appointment. But when I first got his voicemail, my anger was compounded by T's explanation that his comment wasn't directed towards that specific session because my memory is that it, in fact, was. And that we were actually talking about that session right at that moment. And so, then I felt like, oh, does he think I'm so stupid that I'm not going to realize that we were in fact talking about that session? And at first I felt as though he was really trying to "gaslight" me.
And, so now that I've calmed down a little, I'm asking myself how do I deal with possibly two different explanations of what happened, mine and his? How do I accept his explanation without invalidating my own perceptions? I realize that my intense reaction is probably based on the past but .... beyond that, I hate this feeling of being snowed, like I have to stuff my own reactions here because T offered a different explanation of what happened.