I've been thinking about this for a little while now. The topic of emotional abuse came up in my first session with my new T, and I have been thinking about it. I explained how "abuse" is such a strong word, and it seems like it implies intention on the part of the abuser. I believe this fervently for myself, but any time I've looked it up, read stories about it, read about others' experiences on this forum, I don't believe that. It's so frustrating how seemingly simple it is for me to look objectively (for the most part) at other people's situations and know that their situations are abusive. Even if it is clear that the abuse was not intentional, but more along the lines of oversight and neglect. I believe this for others, but I can't believe it for myself. I mean, I know that I'm only just starting to see the abnormality of my "normal," but it seems like such a far fetched thing for me to embrace that I don't think I could ever do it. It seems unfathomable. But, when I try (key word: try) to take a more objective, reasonable look at the situation, I can't leave out that there are very large chunks of my childhood that I just don't remember. So, I suppose I can't be entirely sure...
I guess what I'm really struggling with is if it is considered abuse when your parents think they are doing the right thing, but consistently get it wrong. Ugh, this is so frustrating, because as I typed that, I questioned whether my parents were always considerate of what was "right" for me. Well, I guess I can rephrase that. I think my parents thought that they were always doing what was best for me, but they would lose sight of that and react angrily, impulsively, what-have-you, toward me. I just don't know where the line is as far as labeling it as abusive. My last T said that my trainer (I rode horses my whole life up until I went to college) was emotionally abusive toward me. From the brief descriptions of my family and of my trainer to the new T, she seemed to think so as well. She asked me what I thought of their actions (or inactions) toward me, and I described it as inconsiderate and a complete lack of understanding. She said, "Ok, if 'inconsiderate' works for you right now, then that's fine."
I'm just afraid that as I get deeper into therapy and eventually explore my childhood and my interactions with my parents, I am going to be confirmed in my thinking that anything angry they said to me was always my fault. It's like I keep waiting to be told that yes, the only explanation for me being as insecure, hesitant, distant, etc., is because I was born this way. In my last group session when I explained a little about the argument I had with my mother, one of the group members that he didn't know my mother, so he didn't know if it was entirely appropriate of him to say what he planned on saying….and at this point, I braced (literally and figuratively) to be told that I overreacted and that I should have listened to my mother better…something like that. But he actually said that he thought of my mother as selfish. I was shocked, but even hearing that from him (which was also a view that the rest of the group supported), I still think that I caused everything.
Well, I feel like I went a little off topic at the end there, but my original question is the same: is abuse always intentional?