T got confused and thought I was crying during the argument, which was wholly about stupid things. And I responded with immediate disdain for crying during arguments. He asked, "Because it feels unsafe, vulnerable?" And I said, "No, with other people maybe, but not with H. With H, it makes him suddenly start being nice and it feels patronizing, drives me crazy." T tried to explain it was a normal reaction to seeing someone you care about upset or something, but I cut him off and countered that it shouldn't make someone change their mind about whatever thing they believed was wrong or found upsetting. That if it was true in the first place, and not just saying something out of anger in order to hurt, that it should still be true even if I'm crying and it makes me very angry if my crying causes them to backtrack, change how they feel. This mostly happens with H and I feel like either he didn't mean what he said in the first place or he doesn't mean it now. Either way, the truth should not be based on my feelings or my emoting, and while he could be kind and sorry that what he said upset me, he could do so without invalidating his original statements. Anyway, it all has to do with a way reality in my mom's house had to be based on what my mom needed it to be, so I'm pretty sensitive to things not being that way with me.
So, after I've explained it (albeit much more succinctly to T, because he knows all lot of this stuff already and also, I still sometimes clam up), T busts out with, "Wow, that's impressive!" This was immediately following my "the truth shouldn't change" comment. I had my usual reaction to him saying anything that sounds remotely complimentarily, which is:
1. AHHH, stop stabbing me with your positive regard!!!
2. If you have to make such comments, I demand you justify them at once.
T saw my reaction before I verbalized it and said something like, "Ooooh, you don't like that," and teased nicely a bit about my horrified reaction to having others think well of me. I told him partially it was automatic, but partially, I had no idea how such a statement could be "impressive," and it made me even more anxious, because it didn't make sense.
He got thoughtful and labeled his statement as counter-transference. I expressed curiosity once more and he set a boundary and said it's something for him to talk to his therapist or God about. He even asked if I knew what counter-transference was. Considering I have talked and journaled about it only dozens of times. I was extremely curious still and tried to resolve myself to respect his boundary, which he interpreted as anger and me shutting down, but it wasn't (and I explained, but also then got angry about him insisting I felt angry when I didn't).
Anyway, I know it's off-limits, so I won't bring it up to him again, but I find myself worrying about it today. If it's "impressive," I suppose it isn't bad, right? Maybe it's just some sort of comparison to other figures in his life or something. Still, I keep getting stuck on it. Because it is something he feels about ME, I can't stop trying to figure it out. It's driving me nuts today.
So, I guess, how do I let it go? I'd really like to not have to talk to him about what it feels like to not be able to know.
Or, any theories?