Skip to main content

The PsychCafe
Share, connect, and learn.
I know at first glance this seems like a strange book to post about in a forum on therapy, but bear with me.

I am a big Austen fan and occasionally re-read her books (btw, there is a wonderful omnibus of all her writing available in Kindle format at Amazon for only $1.99: Jane Austen: The Complete Collection (With Active Table of Contents) ) and I just finished re-reading Sense and Sensibility.

And something really struck me this time in reading it (it's why I love to re-read Austen, I seem to get different things each time) which is the contrast in indulging in our feelings and exerting ourselves to master our feelings. For those who are not familiar, the story is about two sisters: Marianne and Elinor. Marianne is deeply sensitive and passionate, and disdains people who actually have calmer feelings as not really being worthwhile. Elinor is more temperate, and although she feels as deeply as Marianne, is also committed to regulating those feelings so as to not impose on the people around her.

The books opens with the loss of their father and it is here where we first see their differing methods contrasted. Marianne deliberately seeks out situations that deepen and intensify her feelings of grief, such as playing the music her father loved. Elinor was left to handle necessary arrangements such as dealing with dismissing servants, finding a new place to live and even interacting with her half-brother and sister-in-law (who now owned the estate where they grew up) because she felt it was important to master her own feelings.

As the book progresses we see both women fall in love and handle the situations very differently, again with Marianne being incredibly indulgent in how she handles her feelings, while Elinor always strives to regulate hers.

So what really hit me while reading this, as I am in the midst of a five week break with my T, was that no matter how justified my feelings are and deserving of compassion (there are really good reasons for why I find it difficult to do without my T for five weeks), how I treat those feelings is still within my control. So like Marianne, I could dwell on my fear and my pain and seek out things that would intensify those feelings. Or like Elinor, I can strive to place my feelings in proper context (my fear is misplaced, and I am not really in danger during my Ts absence) and exert myself so that I can find space between me and my feelings and try to hang onto reality. There are varying degrees of success with this strategy and it doesn't stop the feelings from coming, but I must admit that it feels more productive to engage in activity that helps me move through the time, rather than seek out that which will only make it worse by dwelling too much on his absence.

Anyway, I found it helpful to think along these lines of exerting myself from a feelings standpoint and pass it along in case anyone else finds it helpful (or is a fellow Austenphile. Smiler )

AG
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

When Marianne is sick, stuck in London at Mrs. Jennings, my distress becomes an urge to leap into the pages of the book and save her from herself. Perhaps there is a moral there as well, at least for me.

I think those chapters about Marianne's illness are among Austen's most moving.

All worthwhile literature can be psychologically relevant, yes? I am glad you posted this here and enjoyed your thoughts. It would be fun to see the book forum pick up a bit. Maybe a more diverse approach to genre will help.
Effed,
Thank you! Good to know there's another fan here. And I totally agree. One of the things I find so enjoyable about reading Austen is that she is so good at presenting all the foibles of human behavior with an especially keen eye for the absurd. Smiler

HIC,

I find what you said fascinating because my sympathies always tend to be with Elinor. I think part of that is that I actually saw the Emma Thompson/Ang Lee movie of Sense & Sensibility before I read the book. The scene at the end, when Elinor finds that something she thought impossible to ever have is actually in her reach touches me deeply because she didn't fall apart until it was all over. That feeling is one that I have experienced in therapy at times and have cried that way. I actually told my therapist about the scene in the movie to explain how I felt.

So it was very striking to me that you focused on Marianne (and btw, I do agree with you that those were very moving.) And I also have to agree that I can also relate to the impulse of saving someone from themselves, I feel it so often about myself. Smiler

I really appreciate your reassurance that great literature can be psychologically relevant. I feel more sane and less alone. Books have always been very important to me. I will be thinking about other works of literature to talk about and hope others will do the same. I agree that it could generate some very interesting discussions.

AG
This is a great thread. I think novels are great fodder for thinking about our own inner worlds and the wider influences (family, life events etc) can have.

The Hunger Games novels give a really insightful commentary on how different people in families adopt different strategies to cope with loss, grief and hardship.

*Spoiler for those that haven't read them*

*

*

*

*

When Katniss' father is killed in the mine explosion, her mother withdraws into herself and doesn't speak, function, wash... essentially she breaks down completely and cannot look after Katniss and her sister.

Katniss eventually takes charge so they will survive. Suzanne Collins does a great job of portraying what this does to Katniss' attachments. She's not affectionate to her mother, hard, a survivor. She's deeply hurt and angry that her mother 'abandoned' them and shows all the signs of insecure attachment (probably a dismissive pattern, although it could be disorganized - these things aren't neat boxes). She won't risk being hurt again and this is characterised in her relationship with Gale and Peeta. She relies on her own resources in times of stress and it is telling that she most identifies with her games mentor Haymitch, a former winner of the games who has a similarly cynical outlook towards other people.

Her younger sister Prim on the other hand is kind and gentle and caring. It's uncertain whether this is because she was spared some of the effects loss of an attachment figure because Katniss stepped in to fill the gap, or because she's coped by developing a more preoccupied attachment style, which may involve looking after people, anticipating their needs.

Katniss thinks of herself as damaged and her sister as normal but it's not as clear cut as that I don't think.

Anyway, enough rambling!
Mallard
Totally agree about hunger games. Actually one thing I really loved about the end of the series was SPOILER ALERT -----------------



Was how even though Katniss came through and even built a full life with Peeta, it took her time to heal, she always bore the scars and it was love that pulled her through. That seemed to me much more real than her and Peeta walking off into the sunset like nothing ever happened. She experienced some intensely traumatic events and you see the effects of those experiences.
END SPOILER ------------------
I love novels. I have not read sense and sensibility in a long time. Might be time to go pull that one out and re-read it. I agree totally about the Hunger games! Another good on is Divergent. I have only read the first book and have not seen the movie. I kind of envy her being able to choose something other than what her family wanted her to. I wish I could take that courage right out of the book and just inject it!!

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×